溶栓治疗对急性心肌梗死患者窦性心率震荡及心率变异性的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Influences of thrombolytic therapy on heart rate turbulence and heart rate variability in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察溶栓治疗对急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者窦性心率震荡(heart rate turbulence,HRT)及心率变异性(heart rate variability,HRV)的影响。方法:62例AMI患者按溶栓治疗后有无血管再通分为再通组(n=38)和未通组(n=24),并选择同期未行溶栓治疗的20例AMI患者做对照组。起病后1~2周行动态心电图检查分析反应HRT的指标震荡起始(turbulence onset,TO)及震荡斜率(turbulence slope,TS),及HRV相关指标全部窦性心搏RR间期(NN间期)的标准差(standard diviation of NN intervals,SDNN)、全程相邻NN间期之差的均方根值(root mean square of sussessive differences,RMSSD)及全部NN间期中,相邻的NN间期之差大于50 ms的心搏数除以总的NN间期个数、乘以100(PNN50)。结果:再通组TO值低于未通组及对照组[(-1.54±2.03)% vs. (0.15±2.51)%,(0.21±1.94)%,q=3.71,P=0.006],而TS、SDNN、RMSSD及PNN50均高于未通组及对照组[分别为(6.89±2.14) ms/RR vs. (2.46±1.90) ms/RR,(2.55±2.38) ms/RR,q=3.64,P=0.008;(118.62±27.13) ms vs. (82.56±30.47) ms,(85.62±27.79) ms,q=4.27,P=0.002;(27.23±9.72) ms vs. (17.03±8.47) ms,(16.72±8.68) ms,q=3.95,P=0.005;(8.64±2.36)% vs. (3.14±1.87)%,(2.96±1.70)%,q=4.73,P=0.001];溶栓治疗后血管再通与TO值负相关(rs=-0.257,P=0.001),而与TS、SDNN、RMSSD、PNN50正相关(rs分别为0.490、0.273、0.466、0.392,P=0.000)。结论:溶栓治疗成功能改善AMI患者HRT指标并提高HRV,改善AMI患者心脏自主神经功能,可能减少恶性心律失常发生,改善预后。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To assess the influences of thrombolytic therapy on heart rate turbulence(HRT) and heart rate variability(HRV) in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods:Sixty-two patients with AMI underwent thrombolytic therapy were di-vided into recanalization group(n=38) and non-recanalization group(n=24) and another 20 AMI patients without recanalization were selected as control group. The 24 h ambulatory electrocardiogram recordings were taken within 1-2 weeks after onset of AMI. HRT pa-rameters,turbulence onset(TO) and turbulence slope(TS) were calculated and HRV analysis was performed using time domain pa-rameters standard diviation of NN intervals(SDNN),root mean square of sussessive differences(RMSSD) and percentage of differ-ences exceeding 50 ms between adjacent normal number of intervals(PNN50)(6.89±2.14) ms/RR vs. (2.46±1.90) ms/RR,(2.55±2.38) ms/RR,q=3.64,P=0.008;(118.62±27.13) ms vs. (82.56±30.47) ms,(85.62±27.79) ms,q=4.27,P=0.002;(27.23±9.72) ms vs. (17.03±8.47) ms,(16.72±8.68) ms,q=3.95,P=0.005;(8.64±2.36)% vs.(3.14±1.87)%,(2.96±1.70)%,q=4.73,P=0.001 respectively). Results:HRV was markedly reduced while HRT was markedly blunted in non-recanalization group and control group than in recanalization group(P<0.01 for all). There were correlations between vascular recanalization after recanalization and HRV,HRT parameters(TO:rs=-0.257;TS:rs=-0.490;SDNN:rs=0.273;RMSSD:rs=0.466;PNN50:rs=0.392;P≤0.001 for all). Conclusions:Successful thrombolytic therapy can improve the parameters of HRV and HRT and protect heart autonomic nervous sys-tem function in patients with AMI so as to improve their prognosis.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周佾龙,杨韶华.溶栓治疗对急性心肌梗死患者窦性心率震荡及心率变异性的影响[J].重庆医科大学学报,2013,(3):297-299

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-05-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码