Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for patients with acute leukemia:clinical effects analysis in 50 cases
Author:
Affiliation:
Fund Project:
摘要
|
图/表
|
访问统计
|
参考文献
|
相似文献
|
引证文献
|
资源附件
|
文章评论
摘要:
目的:评价外周血造血干细胞移植(peripheral blood stem cell transplantation,PBSCT)治疗急性白血病(acute leukemia,AL)的临床疗效,比较异基因PBSCT(allogeneic PBSCT,Allo-PBSCT)与自体PBSCT(autologous PBSCT,Auto-PBSCT)在AL治疗方面的优缺点,探讨移植预处理方案的选择及疗效。方法:回顾性分析我院从2004-2012年间收治的50例因AL行PBSCT的病例,其中21例男性,29例女性,行Allo-PBSCT及Auto-PBSCT的分别为28例及22例。分析移植疗效及并发症,比较异基因及自体移植复发率、无病生存率(disease-free survival,DFS)及移植相关死亡率(transplant related mortality,TRM)的差异。分析预处理死亡及植入成功率。结果:50例患者中除2例MAC(马法兰+阿糖胞苷+环磷酰胺)方案预处理患者植入失败外,其余48例获得造血重建,移植成功率96%,中位白细胞植活时间(>0.5×109个/L)为11.3 d[(7~24) d],中位血小板植活时间(>20×109个/L)为14.3 d[(5~44) d]。异基因移植与自体移植相关死亡例数分别为8例、3例,TRM为28.6%、15.0%;累计DFS分别为46.4%、35.0%;累计复发率分别为25.0%、55.0%。随访时间内异基因及自体移植的总存活率(overall survival rate,OS)为57.1%、50.0%,两者移植前处于首次化疗缓解(complete remission at first course,CR1)及非首次化疗缓解或未缓解状态的患者,移植后OS分别为61.5%、53.3%及45.5%、55.6%;累计DFS分别为46.2%、46.7%及27.3%、44.4%;死亡率分别为38.5%、46.7%及54.5%、44.4%。结论:PBSCT是治疗AL的有效手段,特别是移植前状态处于CR1的患者移植效果更好。异基因移植后复发率较自体移植低,长期DFS较高,但移植相关并发症多,TRM较高。预处理方案的优化是提高移植疗效的关键,以马利兰/环磷酰胺方案为基础的预处理方案有较好的清髓效果及耐受。
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation(PBSCT) in the treatment of acute leukemia(AL),to discuss advantages and disadvantages of allogeneic PBSCT(Allo-PBSCT) and autologous PBSCT(Auto-PBSCT) and to choose the appropriate preparative transplantation regimen. Methods:All fifty patients with AL underwent PBSCT from 2004 to 2012 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed including 21 male and 29 female. Twenty-eight patients were treated with Allo-PBSCT and 22 with Auto-PBSCT. Effects of transplantation and complications were analyzed. Differences in transplantation relapse rate,disease-free survival(DFS) and transplant related mortality(TRM) were compared. Preparative regimen related death and suc-cess rate were analyzed. Results:No pretreatment scheme related death was occurred except 2 cases of MAC(melphalan+Cytarabine+cyclophosphamide) preparative regimen implanted failure. Forty-eight patients engrafted successfully with transplant success rate of 96%. Median time of white blood cell>0.5×109/L was 11.3 d((7-24) d) and platelets>20×109/L was 14.3 d((5-44) d). Allo-PBSCT and Auto-PBSCT related death cases were 8 cases and 3 cases respectively with TRM of 28.6% and 15.0%,respectively. During the follow-up,accumulative DFS for Allo-PBSCT and Auto-PBSCT were 46.4% and 35.0% respectively;accumulative relapse rates were 25.0% and 55.0%,respectively. During follow-up,overall survival(OS) rates of Allo-PBSCT and Auto-PBSCT were 57.1% and 50.0%,respectively. Among patients under the condition of complete remission at first course(CR1) and complete remission after two or more course or non-remission before transplantation,OS rates were 61.5%,53.3% and 45.5%,55.6%;DFS were 46.2%,46.7% and 27.3%,44.4%;death rates were 38.5%,46.7% and 54.5%,44.4%,respectively after transplantation. Conclusions:PBSCT is effective in the treatment of AL. Effect is better for patients under the condition of CR1 before transplantation. Relapse rate is lower,long-term DFS is higher and transplant related complications are more in Allo-PBSCT than in Auto-PBSCT. Optimization of preparative regimen is the key to improve transplantation efficacy,preparative regimen based on busulfan/cyclophosphamide regimen has a better effect of pulp and tolerance.