Comparative of four neuropsychological scales in early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease
Author:
Affiliation:
Fund Project:
摘要
|
图/表
|
访问统计
|
参考文献
|
相似文献
|
引证文献
|
资源附件
|
文章评论
摘要:
目的:评估4种神经心理学量表在阿尔茨海默病(Alzheimer’s disease,AD)早期诊断中的应用价值。方法:对109例受试者:AD组24例、轻度认知功能损害(mild cognitive impairment,MCI)组40例、正常认知(normal cognition,NC)组45例,采用记忆及执行功能筛查量表(memory and executive screening,MES)、听觉词语学习测试华山版(auditory verbal learning test-Huashan version,AVLT-H)、简易智能状态量表(mini-mental state examination,MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(Montreal cognitive assess-ment scale,MoCA)4种量表测试,对测试结果进行比较分析。结果:每种量表评分在3组间均具有统计学差异(P<0.01);AVLT-H短延迟回忆及长延迟回忆与文化程度无显著相关性(P >0.05);以MES评分80分为临界值诊断MCI的敏感度及特异性分别为95.6%和75.0%,AVLT-H长延迟回忆取4分为临界值诊断MCI的敏感度及特异性最高(100.0%和99.84%)。结论:MES及AVLT-H对AD早期具有很高的诊断价值且不受文化程度影响。
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of four neuropsychological scales in early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease(AD). Methods:Totally 109 subjects were divided into three groups:24 in AD group,40 in mild cognitive impairment(MCI) group,45 in normal cognition(NC) group. Four scales were adopted including memory and executive screening(MES),auditory verbal learning test-Huashan version(AVLT-H),mini-mental state examination(MMSE)and Montreal cognitive assessment scale(MoCA). Scores of the four scales were compared and analyzed. Results:For each scale,there were significant differences among the scores of three groups(P<0.01). The scores of short-term and of AVLT-H were not correlated with education level(P >0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of MES were 95.6% and 75.0% respectively using a cut-off score of 80. The sensitivity and specificity reached the highest (100.00% and 99.84%) when taking a cut-off score of 4 in long-term delay recall of AVLT-H. Conclusions:Both MES and AVLT-H are of great value in diagnosing AD at early stage and are not influenced by the education level.