不同年龄组前列腺癌临床特征与预后因素分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for prostate cancer in different age groups
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较不同年龄组新发前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)患者的临床特点及预后因素分析。方法:将我院从2006年1月至2013年5月间收治的新发PCa患者共105例分为低龄组(<60岁)和高龄组(≥60岁),其中低龄组45例(中位年龄56岁)、高龄组60例(中位年龄72岁)。比较2组人群的首发症状、国际前列腺症状评分(international prostate symptom rating scale,IPSS)、总前列腺特异性抗原(total prostatespecific antigen,TPSA)、病理Gleason评分、临床分期、骨转移情况以及治疗方式。结果:2组患者却以尿频、排尿困难为首发症状占主导,只有骨痛症状在2组间有统计学意义(Z=-2.436,P=0.015);低龄组患者中IPSS评分为轻、中、重症状的有11、23、11例,高龄组患者分别为8、15、37例,高龄组中患者症状较重(Z=-3.460,P=0.001);低龄组和高龄组患者的TPSA中位值分别为97.77、47.32 ng/ml,有统计学意义(Z=-2.830,P=0.005);低龄组和高龄组Gleason评分小于7分、等于7分、大于7分的患者分别为12、17、16例和30、19、11例,有统计学意义(Z=-2.580,P=0.01);低龄组患者临床分期为Ⅰ~Ⅱ期有17例、Ⅲ~Ⅳ期有28例,高龄组患者临床分期为Ⅰ~Ⅱ期有32例、Ⅲ~Ⅳ期有28例,2组临床分期无统计学意义(Z=2.500,P=0.114);低龄组和高龄组的骨转移分别为28例和22列,有统计学意义( ?字2=4.618,P=0.032);低龄组和高龄组行前列腺癌根治术的患者分别有15例、26例,余患者行内分泌治疗。结论:低龄组和高龄组患者多数以尿频、排尿困难为首发症状就诊,低龄组中以骨痛症状为首要表现的患者更多;低龄组患者较高龄组症状轻,但TPSA值更高、病理恶性程度高且更易发生骨转移,而2组间临床分期无明显差别。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To explore the different clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) in different age groups. Methods:All 105 patients diagnosed with PCa from January 2006 to May 2013 were divided into young group(<60 years,45 patients) and old group(≥60 years,60 patients). Clinical symptoms,international prostate symptom rating scale (IPSS),total prostate specific antigen(TPSA),clinical staging,Gleason score,incidence of bone metastasis,and treatment in both groups were explored. Results:Frequent micturition and dysuria were the primary symptoms in both groups; there were significant differences in the symptom of ostalgia between the two groups(Z=-2.436,P=0.015). There were significant differences in the IPSS score,TPSA value,and Gleason score between the two groups(Z=-3.460,P=0.001)(Z=-2.830,P=0.005)(Z=-2.580,P=0.01). There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical staging(Z=2.500,P=0.114) but there were statistical differences in bone metastasis incidence between the two groups(?字2=4.618,P=0.032). Fifteen and 26 patients respective in young group and old group received radical prostatectomy;the others underwent endocrine therapy. Conclusion:Frequent micturition and dysuria are the primary symptoms in both groups;but more patients in young group suffer from ostalgia symptom. The symptoms are lighter in young group;but TPSA value,pathological malignant degree and bone metastasis are more severe in young group. There is no difference in clinical staging between the two groups.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

姚 烽,王 明,苟 欣.不同年龄组前列腺癌临床特征与预后因素分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2014,38(11):1569-1572

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-11-03
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码