免疫金标法与化学法检测胃液隐血方法学评价
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Evaluation on gold immunochromatography assay and chemical method in detection of occult blood in gastric juice
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:浅析免疫金标法(gold immunochromatography assay,GICA)与化学法检测胃液隐血的方法学评价。方法:以我院2012年1月至2013年1月胃液隐血检测的311例患者为研究对象,对其送检的胃液或呕吐物同时行GICA和化学法检查。结果:GICA、化学法的阳性预测率、阴性预测率、诊断符合率分别为64.73%、100.00%、79.74%,70.00%、53.09%、65.59%;两者联合诊断时诊断符合率可达95.38%。结论:GICA的阳性预测值与化学法并无统计学差异,但阴性预测值、诊断符合率明显优于化学法。可通过两法联合诊断来提高检测结果准确性。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To explore the value of gold immunochromatography assay(GICA) and chemical method in the detection of oc-cult blood in gastric juice. Methods:Totally 311 patients were taken as test samples. Chemical method and GICA were used to detect the gastric juice and vomits. Results:The positive predictive rates of GICA and chemical method were 64.73% and 100%;the negative predicative rates of GICA and chemical method were 79.74% and 70%;diagnostic accordance rates of GICA and chemical method were 53.09% and 65.59%.The combined diagnosis coinci-dence rate can reach 95.38%. The specificity and coincidence of GICA was better than those of chemical method with statis-tically significant differences(P<0.05). Conclusion:GICA is su-perior to chemical method in negative predictive value and diagnostic accordance. The combination of both methods can improve the accuracy of the diagnostic therapy

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李 月,代震宇,陈 觅.免疫金标法与化学法检测胃液隐血方法学评价[J].重庆医科大学学报,2014,38(12):1799-1801

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-11-06
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码