Role of procedural sedation guided by intracranial pressure monitoring in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury
Author:
Affiliation:
Fund Project:
摘要
|
图/表
|
访问统计
|
参考文献
|
相似文献
|
引证文献
|
资源附件
|
文章评论
摘要:
目的:探讨有创颅内压监测指导下程序化镇静在重症颅脑损伤治疗作用。方法:收集我院2006年7月至2014年7月期间300例患者,根据实施方案不同分为3组(常规组、镇静组、联合组)。收集治疗前后格拉斯哥昏迷评分(Glasgow coma score,GCS)差值、住院天数、简易智力状况检查量表(mini-mental status examination,MMSE)评分、Barthel指数(Barthel index,BI)评分差异和再出血发生率、病死率、肺部感染率资料,建立Excel数据库。3组再出血率、病死率和肺部感染率比较采用卡方检验。GCS差值、住院天数、MMSE评分和BI评分采用方差分析。结果:3组比较时各观察指标差异均有统计学意义。其中,GCS差值在常规组、镇静组、联合组两两比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在常规组和联合组中住院天数、MMSE评分、BI评分和病死率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在镇静组和联合组中MMSE评分、BI评分和病死率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在常规组和镇静组中,再出血率、肺部感染率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:颅内压监护下程序化镇静更有利于改善重症颅脑损伤预后,缩短治疗时间,降低患者肺部感染以及再出血。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of procedural sedation under the guidance of intracranial pressure monitoring in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury. Methods:Totally 300 patients in our hospital from July 2006 to July 2014 were divided into 3 groups(conventional group,sedation group and combination group). Glasgow coma score(GCS) before and after the treatment,hos-pitalization days,mini-mental status examination scale(MMSE) score,Barthel index(BI) score,rebleeding,mortality,lung infection data were recorded and Excel database was established. Rebleeding,mortality and lung infection rates of three groups were compared using χ2 test;GCS difference,hospitalization days,MMSE score and BI score were analyzed using analysis of variance. Results:There were statistically significant differences in all indicators mentioned above among three groups. GCS difference were significantly dif-ferent between conventional group,sedative group and combination group(P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in hospitalization days,MMSE score,BI score and mortality between sedative group and combination group(P<0.05). There were statisti-cally significant differences in rebleeding rate and lung infection rate between sedative group and conventional group(P<0.05). Con-clusion:intracranial pressure monitoring procedural sedation is more conducive to improving the prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury,shortening treatment time and reducing lung infection and bleeding in patients.