GuttaFlowR 2常温流动牙胶在磨牙急性牙髓炎一次性根管治疗的应用
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


GuttaFlowR 2 non-heated flowable gutta-percha in one-visit root canal therapy for molar acute pulpitis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探讨GuttaFlowR 2常温流动牙胶在后牙急性牙髓炎一次性根管治疗中的疗效,为更高效、更舒适、更简单的治疗提供依据。方法:选取90颗后牙随机分为2组,A组45颗以GuttaFlowR 2常温流动牙胶配合主尖行单尖法一次性根管治疗,B组45颗以iRoot SP配合主尖做一次性热牙胶充填。对A、B组治疗时间,以及治疗后24 h、3 d、7 d、1个月、3个月疼痛指数与治疗有效率进行对比,用统计学方法比较两者差异。结果:在治疗操作时间上,A组为(63.20±6.54) min,B组为(86.12±8.08) min,A组明显优于B组(P<0.01)。A、B 2组疼痛指数在治疗后24 h分别为(2.40±0.54)和(4.60±1.31),治疗后3 d分别为(1.80±0.63)和(3.10±1.23),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);而治疗7 d、1个月、3个月后均无明显差异(P>0.05);A、B两组治疗有效率在各时间点均无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:GuttaFlowR 2常温流动牙胶在单尖法一次性根管治疗中具有很好的治疗效果,相比热牙胶充填有着其独特优势,可普遍用于一次性后牙根管治疗,同时也给专科医生提供了新思路,为大家自主创新提供了参考。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To study the treatment effect of one-visit root canal therapy for molar acute pulpitis using GuttaFlowR 2,thus to provide a more efficient,comfortable way and lay a basis for simpler treatment. Methods:Totally 90 molar teeth were selected and divid-ed into two groups,45 teeth in A group used GuttaFlowR 2 plus single cone obturation treatment,45 teeth in B group used iRoot SP plus thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique. The treatment time,and the difference of pain index and efficiency between two groups after 24 hours,3 days,7 days,one month and three months were compared. Results:Concerning the treatment operation time,the group A was (63.20±6.54) min,while the group B was (86.12±8.08) min,the group A was significantly better than the group B(P<0.01). The pain index of group A and group B was (2.40±0.54) and (4.60±1.31) at 24 hours after treatment,and (1.80±0.63) and (3.10±1.23) after 3 days respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups in pain index after 24 h and 3 days(P<0.05),but no significant difference after 7 days,one month and 3 months(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the efficiency at each time point(P>0.05). Conclusion:GuttaFlowR 2 non-heated flowable gutta-percha has a good therapeutic effect in the treatment of one-visit root canal therapy and has its unique ad-vantage. It can be widely used in one-visit root canal therapy in molars compared with hot gum filling. It also provides a new idea for independent innovation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李成龙,吴也可,李 铀,牟雁东. GuttaFlowR 2常温流动牙胶在磨牙急性牙髓炎一次性根管治疗的应用[J].重庆医科大学学报,2018,(9):1233-1236

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-09-12
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码