Objective:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of high intensity focused ultrasound(HIFU) combined with ultrasound-guided curettage for treating type Ⅱ caesarean scar pregnancy(CSP). Methods:Eighty-two patients with type Ⅱ CSP from Suning Central Hospital were divided into 3 groups based on the diameter of pregnancy sac:10-mm group,20-mm group,30-mm group. All the patients from the three groups were first treated with HIFU,and then had ultrasound-guided curettage. Results:The number of the three groups was 23,36,23 respectively. The sonication power used for the three groups was 397(350 to 399),399(387 to 400),400(399 to 400) W respectively(P=0.000). The treatment time for the three groups was 37.0(27.0 to 48.0),62.0(37.5 to 78.0),64.0(46.0 to 84.0) min respectively(P=0.001). The sonication time for the three groups was 250(200 to 321),415(252 to 680),522(400 to 800) s respectively(P=0.000). The average sonication intensity for the three groups was (435.7±128.0),(487.0±105.1),(558.4±118.9) s/h,respectively(P=0.002). The median blood loss in the procedure of curettage was 20(10 to 30),20(15 to 35),30(20 to 100) mL respectively(P=0.000). When treating the bigger size sac,the higher the treatment power and treat-ment intensity,the longer sonication time and treatment time,and more blood loss during curettage was observed(P<0.05). The median time of human chorionic gonadotropin(β-hCG) level returning to nomal was 25(24 to 31),27(23 to 30),31(24 to 37)d respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed among the three groups(P=0.248). Conclusion:HIFU combined with ultrasound-guided curettage can be safely used to treat CSP,especially for the sac smaller than 30 mm. For CSP patients with large sac,higher son-ication power and longer sonication time should be given to reduce the blood supply of sac,and therefore to reduce the risk of massive bleeding during curettage.