Clinical characteristics and prognosis in 51 severe cases of COVID-2019
Author:
Affiliation:
Fund Project:
摘要
|
图/表
|
访问统计
|
参考文献
|
相似文献
|
引证文献
|
资源附件
|
文章评论
摘要:
目的:探讨重症新型冠状病毒肺炎(coronavirus disease 2019,COVID-19)确诊病例临床特征、治疗及预后。方法:选取2020年1月21日至2月25日重庆三峡中心医院收治的确诊重症COVID-19患者51例。回顾性分析患者一般资料、临床表现、实验室指标、影像学资料、并发症、治疗及预后情况。结果:51例COVID-19患者中,重型35例(68.6%),危重型16例(31.4%)。51例患者首发症状主要以发热、咳嗽、咳痰、呼吸困难、乏力为主。危重型组呼吸频率快于重型组(P=0.027);危重型组中性粒细胞比率高于重型组(P=0.012);危重型组乳酸脱氢酶(lactate dehydrogenase,LDH)高于重型组(P=0.028);危重型组D-二聚体高于重型组(P=0.013);危重型组降钙素原(procalcitonin,PCT)高于重型组(P=0.013);危重型组白蛋白低于重型组(P=0.004);危重型组氧合指数(partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen,PaO2/FiO2)低于重型组(P=0.040)。危重型组与重型组并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征(acute respiratory distress syndrome,ARDS)、急性呼吸衰竭、脓毒血症、休克、急性心力衰竭比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.006、0.000、0.004、0.012、0.027)。危重型组接受利巴韦林比例、血液滤过治疗比例、无创机械通气比例、有创机械通气比例、俯卧位通气比例均高于重型组,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.008、0.012、0.001、0.000、0.027)。51例患者中,治愈出院24例(47.1%),继续住院17例(33.3%),因病情好转转入轻症肺炎病区6例(11.8%),死亡4例(7.8%)。结论:老年人及合并高血压、糖尿病等基础疾病者发生重型和危重型COVID-19的风险可能较高。危重型COVID-19可能较重型部分实验室指标异常更明显、更易并发ARDS、死亡率更高。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical characteristics,treatment and prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19). Methods:Totally of 51 patients with severe and critical COVID-19 in Chongqing Three Gorges Center Hospital from January 21,2020 to February 25,2020 were included. Cases were analyzed retrospectively for demographic,clinical manifestations,laboratory in-dexes,imaging data,comorbidity,treatment and prognosis. Results:Patients were divided into severe group(n=35,68.6%) and critical group(n=16,31.4%) according to the guideline for diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus infected pneumonia. The most com-mon symptoms at onset of illness were fever,cough,expectoration,dyspnea and fatigue. The rate of respiratory was faster in critical group than in severe group(P=0.027). The ratio of neutrophils was significantly higher in critical group than in severe group(P=0.012). The serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase was significantly higher in critical group than in severe group(P=0.028). The serum D-dimer levels were significantly higher in critical group than in severe group(P=0.013). The serum procalcitonin concentration was significantly higher in critical group than in severe group(P=0.013). The serum levels of albumin was significantly lower in critical group than in severe group(P=0.004). The oxygenation index(PO2/FiO2) was lower in critical group than in severe group(P=0.040). The percentage of complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS),acute respiratory failure,sepsis,shock and acute heart failure occoured in critical group were higher than in severe group(P=0.006,0.000,0.004,0.012,0.027,respectively). The per-centage of treatment such as ribavirin,hemofiltration,noninvasive mechanical ventilation,invasive mechanical ventilation and prone position ventilation accepted were higher in the critical group than in the severe group(P=0.008,0.012,0.001,0.000,0.027,respec-tively). The 51 COVID-19 patients,24 cases(47.1%) were cured and discharged,17 cases(33.3%) were hospitalized,6 cases(11.8%) were transferred to the mild pneumonia area due to the improvement of their condition,and 4 cases(7.8%) died. Conclusion:Elderly patients and those with chronic medical illness may be more likely to develop into severe and critical COVID-19. The laboratory indexes are more abnormal in critical group than those in severe group. The critical COVID-19 patients are more likely have ARDS than se-vere COVID-19. The mortality of critical COVID-19 is higher than that of severe COVID-19.