Comparisons of SOX and FOLFOX6 chemotherapies on operative treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer
Author:
Affiliation:
Fund Project:
摘要
|
图/表
|
访问统计
|
参考文献
|
相似文献
|
引证文献
|
资源附件
|
文章评论
摘要:
目的:比较分析奥沙利铂联合替吉奥(SOX方案)与奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙、氟尿嘧啶(FOLFOX6方案)新辅助化疗在局部进展期胃癌手术患者的疗效、术后转归及生存情况等差异。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2013年8月接受SOX与FOLFOX6化疗方案的87例局部进展期胃癌手术患者资料,按化疗方案,将患者划分为观察组(SOX方案,45例)和对照组(FOLFOX6方案,42例)。比较2组化疗效果、不良反应、手术情况、术后转归、并发症及生存情况等差异。结果:2组化疗方案的疗效、D2淋巴结清扫率、R0切除率、术后并发症发生率、病理退缩分级对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组化疗期间均未见Ⅲ~Ⅳ级不良反应,观察组化疗期间Ⅰ~Ⅱ级恶心呕吐、腹泻发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(35.56% vs. 73.81%, χ2=12.799,P=0.000;6.67% vs. 30.95%, χ2=8.537,P=0.003)。观察组1年、3年、5年无进展生存率分别为95.56%、55.56%、28.89%,对照组分别为92.86%、45.24%、23.81%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(logrank χ2=0.474,P=0.491);观察组1年、3年、5年累积生存率分别为97.78%、62.22%、31.11%,对照组分别为97.62%、50.00%、26.19%,2组比较差异无统计学意义(logrank χ2=0.666,P=0.414)。结论:SOX方案用于局部进展期胃癌化疗,疗效与FOLFOX6方案接近,但胃肠道不良反应风险轻于后者,推荐临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare differences of clinical efficacy,postoperative outcomes and survival between the oxaliplatin com-bined with tegafur(SOX) and the oxaliplatin combined with calcium folinate and fluorouracil(FOLFOX6) neoadjuvant chemotherapies in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods:From January 2012 to August 2013,data of 87 patients with locally ad-vanced gastric cancer underwent operation and received SOX and FOLFOX6 chemotherapies were retrospectively analyzed. According to chemotherapy scheme,these patients were divided into the observation group(SOX,n=45) and the control group(FOLFOX6,n=42). Chemotherapeutic efficacy,adverse reactions,surgical conditions,postoperative outcomes,complications and survival conditions in two groups were compared. Results:There were no significant differences in chemotherapeutic efficacy,dissection rate of D2 lymph node,R0 dissection rate,incidence rate of postoperative complications and pathological tumor regression grade between two groups(P > 0.05). There were no adverse reactions of Ⅲ-Ⅳ level in two groups. The incidence of nausea,vomiting and diarrhea(Ⅰ-Ⅱ level) during chemotherapy in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(35.56% vs. 73.81%,χ2=12.799,P=0.000;6.67% vs. 30.95%, χ2=8.537,P=0.003). The progression-free survival rate in the observation group at 1,3,5 years were 95.56%,55.56%,28.89%,respectively;those in the control group at 1,3,5 years were 92.86%,45.24%,23.81%,respectively,without statisti-cally significant differences(logrank χ2=0.474,P=0.491). The cumulative survival rate in the observation group at 1,3,5 years were 97.78%,62.22%,31.11%,respectively;those in the control group at 1,3,5 years were 97.62%,50.00%,26.19%,respectively,without statistically significant differences(logrank χ2=0.666,P=0.414). Conclusion:For treating the locally advanced gastric cancer,SOX has a similar efficacy FOLFOX6,but has amilder risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions recommending for clinical use.