联合改良呼吸训练与对比剂稀释方案减少磁共振Gd-EOB-DTPA上腹部增强动脉期一过性伪影
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Reduction in respiratory motion artefacts in arterial phase on gadoxetate disodium-upper abdomen enhanced MRI by using gradual and non-gradual breath training methods combined with dilution method versus reduced injection rate
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对比渐进式与非渐进式呼吸训练方案MR钆塞酸二钠(gadoxetate disodium,Gd-EOB-DTPA)上腹部增强检查肝脏动脉期图像质量,联合对比剂1∶1稀释法,探索合理动脉期图像质控的呼吸训练方案与注射方案组合。方法:选择2019年5月至9月在陆军军医大学第一附属医院放射科行MR上腹部Gd-EOB-DTPA增强检查的患者,纳入人口统计学资料无差异且完成MR检查的3组患者,第1组,渐进式呼吸训练法,30名患者,先行吸气后5 s闭气,全腹无起伏达标,之后闭气时间延长至10 s、15 s到20 s;第2组,33名患者,吸气后直接闭气20 s,达标要求同第1组;2组患者对比剂均采用1 mL/s的注射速度行高压注射,之后以相同速度注射20 mL生理盐水冲刷,透视法采集;第3组,32名患者采用非渐进式呼吸训练法,对比剂用1∶1生理盐水稀释,注射速度2 mL/s,共计95例。动脉期图像质量评分标准,1分=无呼吸伪影,2分=轻度呼吸伪影可诊断,3分=中度呼吸伪影可诊断,4分=重度呼吸伪影可诊断,5分=无法诊断。评估每名患者动脉期图像呼吸伪影、肝动脉、门静脉、腹主动脉、肝脏实质的图像评分,计算总分,Kruskal-Wallis检验比较3组各项得分差异性,若有差异则用Mann-Whitney检验两两比较。结果:第3组肝动脉、门静脉、腹主动脉、肝脏实质评分及总分略优于第1组、第2组对应指标评分,但差异不具有统计学意义(P=0.065、0.229、0.819、0.340、0.080)。第3组呼吸伪影明显小于第1组和第2组(P=0.004、0.046),非渐进式对比剂稀释法呼吸伪影更小。结论:采用第3组方案直接闭气20 s呼吸训练,Gd-EOB-DTPA稀释50%注射法可明显降低一过性呼吸运动产生的呼吸伪影。

    Abstract:

    Objective:To compare the image quality of gradual and non-gradual breath training protocols in gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) upper abdomen-enhanced magnetic resonance at hepatic arterial phase,combing with dilution method of 1∶1,so as to explore the most reasonable combination of breath training and injection program. Methods:A total of 95 patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA upper abdomen-enhanced MR imaging in our department from May to September 2019 with no significant difference in the population statistics were selected and divided into three groups:the group 1(30 patients were trained by gradual protocol with the breath time from 5 s,10 s,15 s to 20 s,as no ups and downs of whole abdomen for the standard),the group 2(33 pa-tients were trained by non-gradual protocol with the breath time of 20 s,as no ups and downs of whole abdomen for the stan-dard),and the group 3(32 patients were trained with the same protocol as the group 2). The Gd-EOB-DTPA injection rate in the group 1 and the group 2 was 1 mL/s,with 20 mL normal saline flushing. The 1∶1 diluted with saline Gd-EOB-DTPA injection rate in the group 3 was 2 mL/s,with 20 mL normal saline flushing. All arterial phases were detected by MR fluoroscopic triggering technique. The scoring standard for image quality included:1= no artefact,2=mild and diagnosable artefact,3= moderate and diagnosable arte-fact,4=severe and diagnosable artefact and 5=undiagnosable. Imaging score of hepatic artery,portal vein,abdominal aorta and liver parenchyma was evaluated and the total score were calculated,and differences of the 3 group were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test. Results:The mean score of hepatic artery,portal vein,abdominal aorta and liver parenchyma and the total score in the group 3 were slightly higher than those in the group 1 and the group 2(P=0.065,0.229,0.819,0.340,0.080). The breath-ing artefact in the group 3 was significant smaller than that in the group 1 and the group 2(P=0.004,0.046). The non-gradual diluted method had a smaller respiratory artefact. Conclusion:Holding breath for 20s in the group 3 is adopted and Gd-EOB-DTPA diluted 50% injection method can significantly decrease the respiratory motion artefacts.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

贺姝瑶,王玉婷,陈春云,程琳,王健,赵骏.联合改良呼吸训练与对比剂稀释方案减少磁共振Gd-EOB-DTPA上腹部增强动脉期一过性伪影[J].重庆医科大学学报,2020,45(10):1469-1473

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码