自编简易临床失语量表的信度和效度验证
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院康复医学科,成都 610072;2.四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院精神医学中心神经内科,成都 611130;3.西南医科大学神经病学研究生,泸州 646000;4.四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院精神医学中心神经心理科,成都 611130

作者简介:

通讯作者:

肖军,主任医师,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经内科副主任、四川省精神医学中心神经心理科主任、电子科大临床医学及西南医科大学硕导、四川省卫健委学术技术带头人;中国老年医学学会认知分会副会长,中国医师协会痴呆与认知障碍分会委员,四川省医学会神经内科专委会副主任委员,四川省医学会痴呆与认知功能障碍学组组长,中国认知学会会员,中国AD及相关杂志编委、中华临床医师杂志编委、实用医院临床杂志编委。Email:1458935803@qq.com。

中图分类号:

R320.54

基金项目:

四川省科技厅重点研发资助项目(编号:2020YFS0414)。


The reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences&Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital;2.Neurology Department, Psychiatric Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences&Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital;3.Graduate student in Neurology, Southwest Medical University;4.Neuropsychology Department, Psychiatric Center, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences&Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的: 对自编简易临床失语量表进行信度和效度检验。 方法: 对符合标准的45例正常受试者和46例卒中后失语患者进行自编简易临床失语量表的2次评估:不同评定者间评估、汉语失语成套测验(Aphasia Battery of Chinese,ABC)量表评估。计算本量表的重测信度、内部一致性、评定者间信度及校标效度、结构效度、区分效度。 结果: 简易临床失语量表的重测信度为0.867~0.990;量表克龙巴赫α系数为0.873;评分者间信度为0.862~0.992;因子分析KMO为0.825;区分效度P<0.001;校标效度为0.805~0.953。 结论: 简易临床失语量表对脑卒中后失语症患者的诊断具有较好的信度和效度,可作为卒中后失语症患者言语功能障碍的测评工具。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale. Methods: A total of 45 normal subjects and 46 patients with aphasia after stroke were assessed twice with the self-designed clinical aphasia scale among different raters, and Aphasia Battery of Chinese (ABCJ) scale evaluation was conducted. The retest reliability, internal consistency, inter rater reliability, calibration validity, construction validity and discriminant validity were calculated. Results: The retest reliability of the simple clinical aphasia scale was 0.867-0.990.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.873.The reliability inter the raters was 0.862-0.992.Factor analysis KMO was 0.825, discriminant validity was P<0.001, and calibration validity was 0.805-0.953. Conclusion: The simple clinical aphasia scale has good reliability and validity in the diagnosis of Chinese aphasia after stroke, and can be used as a tool to evaluate the language impairment of patients with aphasia after stroke.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

付婧,张海平,余茜,邢译尹,肖军.自编简易临床失语量表的信度和效度验证[J].重庆医科大学学报,2021,46(11):1320-1323

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-05-30
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码