静脉输注右美托咪定对罗哌卡因骶管阻滞半数有效浓度的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

重庆市中医院麻醉科,重庆 400020

作者简介:

王 府,Email:15223424321@163.com, 研究方向:围术期超声引导下神经阻滞。

通讯作者:

张 亮,Email:seamanzl@126.com。

中图分类号:

R614

基金项目:

重庆市卫计委课题资助项目(编号:2018-ky-1);成都中医药大学课题资助项目(编号:2021-ky-65)。


Effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine on median effective concentration of ropivacaine for caudal block
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Anesthesiology,Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 骶管阻滞具有操作简单、损伤小、起效快和麻醉效果明确等特点,是儿童和成人接受下肢、泌尿系统或肛肠手术的常用麻醉方法。静脉输注右美托咪定(intravenous dexmedetomidine,IV-DEX)是区域麻醉过程中常用的镇静方法,显示了其对局麻药的协同作用。本研究的目的是验证IV-DEX是否会降低局麻药骶管阻滞的半数有效浓度(median effective concentration,EC50)。方法 纳入60例计划行择期痔切除术的患者,分为2组,静脉输注生理盐水组(intravenous-normal saline,IV-NS组)和IV-DEX组。IV-NS组和IV-DEX组分别在骶管阻滞前15 min静脉输注20 mL生理盐水和1 μg/kg右美托咪定(生理盐水稀释至20 mL)。采用Dixon-Massey“上下”顺序分配法确定罗哌卡因骶管阻滞的EC50。记录患者术中生命体征,需要药物处理的低血压、心动过缓和术中其他不良反应发生情况。结果 IV-NS组罗哌卡因骶管阻滞的EC50为0.280%,IV-DEX组为0.233%(P<0.05)。与IV-NS组相比,IV-DEX组中罗哌卡因的EC50降低16.8%(P=0.000),具有统计学差异。2组间需要药物治疗的低血压、心动过缓和术中其他不良反应发生率无统计学差异。结论 IV-DEX可以降低罗哌卡因骶管阻滞的EC50,但IV-DEX可能导致低血压、心动过缓的发生率增加。因此,IV-DEX与局麻药协同作用的最佳剂量仍需要进一步探索。

    Abstract:

    Objective Caudal block,characterized by simple operation,small injury,rapid onset and definite anesthetic effect,is a common anesthesia method for children and adults undergoing lower extremity,urinary system or anorectal surgery. Intravenous dexmedetomidine(IV-DEX) is a commonly used sedative method during regional anesthesia,but it also shows synergistic effect on local anesthetics. This study aims to examine whether IV-DEX reduces the median effective concentration(EC50) of local anesthetics for caudal block.Methods Sixty patients scheduled for elective hemorrhoidectomy were enrolled in the study and divided into intravenous-normal saline(IV-NS) group and IV-DEX group. In IV-NS group and IV-DEX group,20 mL saline and 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (diluted to 20 mL) were intravenously infused 15 min before caudal block, respectively. The EC50 of ropivacaine for caudal block was determined by Dixon-Massey “up and down” sequential assignment method. Vital signs,hypotension, bradycardia,and other intraoperative adverse events requiring medical treatment were recorded.Results The EC50 of ropivacaine for caudal block in IV-NS group was 0.280%,and that in IV-DEX group was 0.233%(P<0.05). Compared with the IV-NS group,the EC50 of ropivacaine in the IV-DEX group was decreased by 16.8%(P=0.000),and the difference was statistically significant. The incidence of hypotension,bradycardia,and other adverse events requiring medical treatment had no difference between the two groups.Conclusion IV-DEX can reduce the EC50 of ropivacaine for caudal block,but it may lead to an increase in the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia. Therefore,the optimal synergistic dose of IV-DEX with local anesthetics still needs to be further explored.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王府,张亮.静脉输注右美托咪定对罗哌卡因骶管阻滞半数有效浓度的影响[J].重庆医科大学学报,2023,48(5):602-607

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-24
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-06-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码