Early clinical analysis of Da Vinci robot assisted laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery on radical surgery of cervical cancer

Abstract:

Objective：To investigate advantages of the Da Vinci robot assisted laparoscopic surgery on radical surgery of cervical can－cer by analyzing clinical data of patients with cervical cancer received radical surgery performed by DaVinci robot assisted laparoscopy and traditional laparoscopic surgery. Methods：Clinical data of 115 patients with cervical cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent Da Vinci robot assisted laparoscopic surgery were classi－fied into robot group（n=50），and others were classified into traditional laparoscopic group（n=65）. Evaluation indexes of surgery and bladder function in two groups were compared. Results：The time of operation，the amount of bleeding，intraoperative fluid infusion and postoperative hospitalization time in the robot group were significantly lower than those in the traditional laparoscopic group（P<0.05）. Time of retained ureter in the robot group was longer than that in the traditional laparoscopic group（P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood transfusion，ureteral replacement and short-time（≤ postoperative six months） urinary system complications after operation（P>0.05）. Conclusion：There is no significant difference in rehabilitation of bladder function between Da Vinci robot assisted laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with cervical cancer，but the Da Vinci robot assisted laparoscopic surgery has shorter operation time，less bleeding amount，and shorter postoperative hospitalization time.