Abstract:Objective: To compare the correlation between endoscopic and pathological diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG), and to explore how to improve the coincidence rate of these two diagnostic methods. Methods: This study included in 192 cases of CAG diagnosed by endoscopy combined with pathologic biopsy, and the coincidence rate between the endoscopic and pathological diagnosis of CAG was retrospectively studied by analyzing the correlation between endoscopic findings and pathological examination results. Results: Among 192 patients with CAG diagnosed by endoscopy, only 56 cases were also confirmed by pathological diagnosis at the same time, with coincidence rate of 29.17%. The atrophic gastritis under the endoscopy showed red and white mucosa, thin mucosa folds or some exposed and transparent blood vessels, mucosa with rough and/or granular or nodular performance and mucosa with these all four characteristics. The coincidence between them was 33.7%, 24.8%, 32.8%, 42.7%, respectively, without significant difference between them (P=0.293). The coincidence rate about endoscopic biopsy location of gastric antrum, gastric angle and gastric body was 25.9%, 39.5% and 47.5%, respectively, with statistical significance (P=0.019). The CAG coincidence rates of 1, 2, 3 and 4 biopsy specimens were 26.6%, 34.5%, 66.7% and 100.0%, respectively, among which the CAG coincidence rates of 1 biopsy specimen between those of more than 1 (2-4) biopsy specimen were not statistically significant (P=0.089).Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection rate of the patients with CAG diagnosed by both endoscopy and pathology was 52.0%, and that of the non-chronic atrophic gastritis cases diagnosed pathologically was 45.5%, with no significant difference between them (P=0.455). There were 50 patients pathologically diagnosed with CAG and they underwent13C breath test. They were divided into A (red and white gastric mucosa, or/and mainly white), B (thin gastric mucosa, exposed and transparent blood vessels) and C (mucosa with rough and/or granular or nodular performance) types according to different microscopic manifestations, and the HP infection rates of the three were 48.5%, 37.5% and 29.2%, respectively, without statistical differences (P=0.594). Conclusion: There are misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis of the CAG through endoscopic examination alone, the awareness of the diversified manifestations under endoscopy and the endoscopy and pathology should be combined to improve the diagnosis rate of the CAG.